Which term describes capabilities such as skills and technology in performance specifications?

The correct term that describes capabilities such as skills and technology in performance specifications is outcome. In the context of performance specifications, outcomes refer to the desired results or changes that are expected as a result of the capabilities being applied. This encompasses not just the end products or services, but also the overall effectiveness and efficiency in achieving the intended goals.

When discussing performance specifications, focusing on outcomes allows organizations to align their skills and technologies with broader business objectives, ensuring that the performance is evaluated not just by what is produced (outputs) but by how well these outputs meet the needs and requirements of stakeholders. This approach emphasizes the importance of achieving specific goals and impacts rather than merely delivering a set quantity or quality of work.

In contrast, outputs refer to the tangible products or services generated as a result of a process, while specifications detail the exact criteria and characteristics that products or services must meet. Conformance relates to the adherence to those specifications but does not directly capture the concept of leveraging skills and technologies for effective performance. Thus, focusing on outcomes is essential for a comprehensive understanding of how capabilities translate into success in performance specifications.